• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Harvard Law School Bankruptcy Roundtable

Harvard Law School Bankruptcy Roundtable

  • Blog
  • About Us
  • Coverage-in-Depth
    • Crypto-Bankruptcy
    • Purdue Pharma Bankruptcy
    • Texas Two-Step and the Future of Mass Tort Bankruptcy
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Bankruptcy Redemption Options

By Richard Hynes (University of Virginia School of Law)

Richard Hynes

The ancient right of redemption allows a party to repurchase assets lost through default at an earlier time. Recently, multiple prominent scholars and the American Bankruptcy Institute have independently proposed granting multi-year or even “perpetual” bankruptcy redemption options to holders of a firm’s junior claims or interests, such as shareholders or unsecured creditors. These options would allow juniors to repurchase or redeem the firm’s equity or assets from whomever received them in bankruptcy. If adopted, these reforms would fundamentally change corporate reorganizations as the current absolute priority rule requires that juniors lose all rights if more senior claims are not paid in full. The reforms would also fundamentally alter the corporate governance of firms emerging from bankruptcy as the investors enjoying the benefits of long-term success would not have voting control. This Article argues that the most plausible benefits of multi-year options could be achieved with shorter options measured in months or even with reforms that do not use options at all. Moreover, extending the options’ duration creates high costs because the former creditors placed in control of the firm will invest too little and take too little risk; if the firm enjoys a high-degree of long-term success, the holders will exercise their options and reap the gains.

Click here to read the full article.

Written by:
Editor
Published on:
May 19, 2026

Categories: Bankruptcy Reform, Chapter 11, Priority, Reorganization, ValuationTags: Absolute Priority, Corporate Governance, Options, Redemption, relative priority, syndicated

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Bankruptcy Redemption Options May 19, 2026
  • Chapter 15 Offers Protection for Cannabis Companies May 12, 2026
  • The Erie Doctrine, Code Common Law, and Choice-of-Law Rules in Bankruptcy May 5, 2026

View by Subject Matter

363 sales Anthony Casey Bankruptcy Bankruptcy administration Bankruptcy Courts Bankruptcy Reform Chapter 11 Chapter 15 Claims Trading Cleary Gottlieb Comparative Law Corporate Governance COVID-19 cramdown David Skeel Derivatives DIP Financing Empirical Financial Crisis fraudulent transfer Jared A. Ellias Jevic Johnson & Johnson Jones Day Mark G. Douglas Mark Roe Mass Torts plan confirmation Priority Purdue Pharma Purdue Pharma bankruptcy restructuring Safe Harbors Schulte Roth & Zabel Sovereign Debt SPOE Stephen Lubben Structured Dismissals Supreme Court syndicated Texas Two-Step Trust Indenture Act Valuation Weil Gotshal Workouts

Footer

Harvard Law School Bankruptcy Roundtable

1563 Massachusetts Ave,
Cambridge, MA 02138
Accessibility | Digital Accessibility | Harvard Law School

Copyright © 2023 The President and Fellows of Harvard College

Copyright © 2026 · Navigation Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in