• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Harvard Law School Bankruptcy Roundtable

Harvard Law School Bankruptcy Roundtable

  • Blog
  • About Us
  • Coverage-in-Depth
    • Crypto-Bankruptcy
    • Purdue Pharma Bankruptcy
    • Texas Two-Step and the Future of Mass Tort Bankruptcy
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

SPAC Bankruptcies

Editor’s Note: This article was originally published in Turnarounds & Workouts, Vol. 37, No. 6., pp 1-5 (subscription required). T&W, now in its 37th year of publication, is produced by Beard Group, Inc.

By Adam Brenneman, Thomas S. Kessler, Jack Massey, and Katharine Ross (Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP)


Adam Brenneman, Thomas S. Kessler, Jack Massey, and Katharine Ross (clockwise from top left)

The past several years have seen a significant rise in de-SPAC transactions, through which a company goes public through a merger with a special purpose acquisition company (“SPAC”) rather than through the traditional IPO process. Recent years have also seen, however, a growing number of companies that went public through de-SPAC transactions seeking chapter 11 relief in the face of economic distress and liquidity crises related to, among other things, decreasing interest in SPAC IPOs, rising redemption rates, increasing regulatory scrutiny, high-profile failures of de-SPAC companies, and high interest rates. As SPAC bankruptcies are relatively new phenomena, they present several potentially interesting and novel issues in the bankruptcy context.

This article discusses this rising trend in SPAC bankruptcies and three potentially interesting issues that may arise and are worth watching for in these cases: (1) the ways in which allegations of securities fraud intersect with and play out in SPAC bankruptcies; (2) the way that convertible debt—often used by SPACs to raise cash, particularly near the end of a de-SPAC transaction where proceeds are intended to replace IPO proceeds that are redeemed by investors—and the claims of convertible noteholders are treated in SPAC bankruptcies; and (3) the treatment of forward share purchase agreements—often used by SPACs to maintain a minimum level of capital at the closing of a de-SPAC transaction—in SPAC bankruptcies.

Click here to read the full article.

Written by:
Editor
Published on:
March 19, 2024
Thoughts:
No comments yet

Categories: Bankruptcy, Chapter 11, Special Purpose Entities and SecuritizationTags: Adam Brenneman, de-SPAC, IPOs, Jack Massey, Katharine Ross, SPAC Bankruptcies, SPACs, syndicated, Thomas Kessler

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Recent Posts

  • The Backstop Party June 17, 2025
  • Independent Directors Properly Exculpated as Debtors’ Disinterested Fiduciaries Under Chapter 11 Plan, Southern District of Texas Bankruptcy Court Rules June 10, 2025
  • The World of Interlocutory Bankruptcy Appeals June 3, 2025

View by Subject Matter

363 sales Anthony Casey Bankruptcy Bankruptcy administration Bankruptcy Courts Bankruptcy Reform Chapter 11 Chapter 15 Claims Trading Cleary Gottlieb Comparative Law Corporate Governance COVID-19 cramdown David Skeel Derivatives DIP Financing Empirical FIBA Financial Crisis fraudulent transfer Jared A. Ellias Jevic Johnson & Johnson Jones Day Mark G. Douglas Mark Roe plan confirmation Priority Purdue Pharma Purdue Pharma bankruptcy restructuring Safe Harbors Schulte Roth & Zabel Sovereign Debt SPOE Stephen Lubben Structured Dismissals Supreme Court syndicated Texas Two-Step Trust Indenture Act Valuation Weil Gotshal Workouts

Footer

Harvard Law School Bankruptcy Roundtable

1563 Massachusetts Ave,
Cambridge, MA 02138
Accessibility | Digital Accessibility | Harvard Law School

Copyright © 2023 The President and Fellows of Harvard College

Copyright © 2025 · Navigation Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in