• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Harvard Law School Bankruptcy Roundtable

Harvard Law School Bankruptcy Roundtable

  • Blog
  • About Us
  • Coverage-in-Depth
    • Crypto-Bankruptcy
    • Purdue Pharma Bankruptcy
    • Texas Two-Step and the Future of Mass Tort Bankruptcy
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Silencing Litigation Through Bankruptcy

By Pamela Foohey (Yeshiva University – Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law) and Christopher K. Odinet (University of Iowa – College of Law)

Pamela Foohey
Pamela Foohey
Odinet-Headshot
Christopher K. Odinet

Bankruptcy is being used as a tool for silencing survivors and their families and to obfuscate the truth. When faced with claims from multiple plaintiffs related to the same wrongful conduct that can financially or operationally crush the defendant over the long term—a phenomenon we identify as onslaught litigation—defendants harness bankruptcy’s reorganization process to draw together those who allege harm and pressure them into a swift, universal settlement. In doing so, they use the bankruptcy system to deprive survivors of their voice. They also seek to decrease information available to the public about the allegations, using bankruptcy to shut down extended discussion of their purported wrongdoings.

This Article identifies this phenomenon and argues that it is time to rein in this destructive use of bankruptcy. Whereas the current literature largely discusses mass tort bankruptcy from a doctrinal, constitutional, or economic perspective, this Article examines how bankruptcy proceedings like these cause direct harms to survivors, to public trust in the justice system, and to the corporate economy. It traces the evolution of defendants’ use of bankruptcy to resolve mass torts from asbestos, IUD, and breast implant product liability litigation to its present-day use in controversies involving the Catholic Church, Purdue Pharma, the Weinstein Companies, USA Gymnastics, the Boy Scouts of America, Alex Jones’s InfoWars, and J&J. The Article shows how the prior use of reorganization for mass torts created the necessary conditions to allow defendants to use bankruptcy to silence people and facilitate cover-ups in a wider variety of onslaught litigation. It concludes with a normative proposal for the narrow circumstances in which courts should allow bankruptcy to be used to deal with onslaught litigation, while still preserving the voices of those harmed.

Click here to read the full article.

Written by:
Editor
Published on:
June 20, 2023

Categories: Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy Reform, Chapter 11, Mass Torts, Purdue Pharma Bankruptcy, Reorganization, Texas Two-Step, Third-Party ReleasesTags: Christopher K. Odinet, nondebtor release, onslaught litigation, Pamela Foohey, procedural justice, syndicated

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Crossing the Rubicon: Assembling a Litigation Colossus in Mass Torts July 15, 2025
  • Exit Consents in a Liability Management World July 8, 2025
  • Bankruptcy Law’s Doctrinal Evolution: An Empirical Study July 1, 2025

View by Subject Matter

363 sales Anthony Casey Bankruptcy Bankruptcy administration Bankruptcy Courts Bankruptcy Reform Chapter 11 Chapter 15 Claims Trading Cleary Gottlieb Comparative Law Corporate Governance COVID-19 cramdown David Skeel Derivatives DIP Financing Empirical Financial Crisis fraudulent transfer Jared A. Ellias Jevic Johnson & Johnson Jones Day Mark G. Douglas Mark Roe Mass Torts plan confirmation Priority Purdue Pharma Purdue Pharma bankruptcy restructuring Safe Harbors Schulte Roth & Zabel Sovereign Debt SPOE Stephen Lubben Structured Dismissals Supreme Court syndicated Texas Two-Step Trust Indenture Act Valuation Weil Gotshal Workouts

Footer

Harvard Law School Bankruptcy Roundtable

1563 Massachusetts Ave,
Cambridge, MA 02138
Accessibility | Digital Accessibility | Harvard Law School

Copyright © 2023 The President and Fellows of Harvard College

Copyright © 2025 · Navigation Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in