• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Harvard Law School Bankruptcy Roundtable

Harvard Law School Bankruptcy Roundtable

  • Blog
  • About Us
  • Coverage-in-Depth
    • Crypto-Bankruptcy
    • Purdue Pharma Bankruptcy
    • Texas Two-Step and the Future of Mass Tort Bankruptcy
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Bankruptcy as Presidential Resistance

By Alvin Velazquez (Indiana University Maurer School of Law)

Alvin Velazquez

Editor’s Note: Professor Velazquez’s article was recently published with the Fordham Urban Law Journal.

Litigation against President Trump for withholding federal funds from cities in his “war on woke” and sanctuary cities has taken place either in Article III courts under the Administrative Procedure Act or in the Court of Federal Claims under the Tucker Act. However, there is a third place to resolve these disputes and allocate who bears the consequences of Presidential action that no one has yet discussed: bankruptcy courts. Federal grants make up about one-third of the average city’s budget, and the President could render a city insolvent by swiftly cutting off a city’s federal grants, through a process scholars call “appropriations presidentialism,” before a city could seek to enjoin such an action. When federal grants are cut off, thousands of workers, vendors, and creditors who rely on those funds as a source of payment would most likely file suit against these cities within weeks to seek payment. In other words, without federal grants, a city’s financial position would be like an “ice cube” rapidly melting away in the hot summer sun. This Essay argues that cities facing “governance by extortion” can use the filing of bankruptcy as an act of political resistance to manage a city’s presidentially induced bankruptcy. In many ways, bankruptcy courts are in a better position than Article III courts to provide relief in this situation. Bankruptcy courts have expertise that Article III courts lack and that indebted cities will need to handle, including creditor coordination problems that are likely to occur when federal grant funds run out. This Essay’s exploration of bankruptcy’s relationship with administrative law expands conversations about the institutional capacity of the judicial system to manage the effects of appropriations presidentialism. Additionally, this Essay situates bankruptcy as a device for coordinating political resistance to governance by extortion.

Click here to read the full article.

Written by:
Editor
Published on:
May 26, 2026

Categories: Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy Administration and Jurisdiction, Bankruptcy Reform, LegislationTags: automatic stay, Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy administration, Bankruptcy Reform, Chapter 9, legislation, syndicated

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Chapter 11 Plan that Abridged Non-Debtor Lessee’s Rights to Remain in Possession After Rejection Unconfirmable as Having Been Proposed in Bad Faith June 16, 2026
  • Former Celsius Customers’ Motion to Withdraw Bankruptcy Court Reference Rejected by SDNY June 9, 2026
  • New Jersey bankruptcy court upholds debtor-chosen venue under Asset Based Approach June 2, 2026

View by Subject Matter

363 sales Anthony Casey Bankruptcy Bankruptcy administration Bankruptcy Courts Bankruptcy Reform Chapter 11 Chapter 15 Claims Trading Cleary Gottlieb Comparative Law Corporate Governance COVID-19 cramdown David Skeel Derivatives DIP Financing Empirical Financial Crisis fraudulent transfer Jared A. Ellias Jevic Johnson & Johnson Jones Day Mark G. Douglas Mark Roe Mass Torts plan confirmation Priority Purdue Pharma Purdue Pharma bankruptcy restructuring Safe Harbors Schulte Roth & Zabel Sovereign Debt SPOE Stephen Lubben Structured Dismissals Supreme Court syndicated Texas Two-Step Trust Indenture Act Valuation Weil Gotshal Workouts

Footer

Harvard Law School Bankruptcy Roundtable

1563 Massachusetts Ave,
Cambridge, MA 02138
Accessibility | Digital Accessibility | Harvard Law School

Copyright © 2023 The President and Fellows of Harvard College

Copyright © 2026 · Navigation Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in