• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Harvard Law School Bankruptcy Roundtable

Harvard Law School Bankruptcy Roundtable

  • Blog
  • About Us
  • Coverage-in-Depth
    • Crypto-Bankruptcy
    • Purdue Pharma Bankruptcy
    • Texas Two-Step and the Future of Mass Tort Bankruptcy
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Liability Management 2026: For Better or Worse

By Joshua A. Feltman, Emil A. Kleinhaus, Michael S. Benn, Benjamin S. Arfa, Michael H. Cassel, Stephanie A. Marshak, and Matthew C. Rowe (Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz)

Joshua A. Feltman, Emil A. Kleinhaus, and Michael S. Benn (add. authors not pictured)

Much ink was spilled in 2025 (and before) arguing that liability management exercises are doomed to fail, with the Financial Times reporting that around 80% of companies default on their restructured debt within three years of an LME. But the success stories are real. Just ask stockholders of Lumen, Carvana, EchoStar, CommScope, U.S. Renal, Boardriders, The RealReal, WideOpenWest, and others. At the same time, the costs involved in LMEs can be significant: direct transaction expenses and (often) increased interest burden, as well as hidden costs when LMEs delay necessary balance-sheet restructurings or lead to deferrals of capital investment. Despite the bad press, LMEs are not going anywhere. To quote Charlie Munger, “show me the incentive and I’ll show you the outcome.” For sponsors and public company boards, the prospect of executing an LME that extends runway and has a meaningful chance of success is tantalizing and, in many cases, a sound alternative to a costly bankruptcy. For creditors, participating in an LME can provide the inside track for improved treatment in a subsequent restructuring and enhance returns regardless of whether an LME proves “successful.” For better or worse, these incentives remain strong, and as a result so too does the place of LMEs at the front of the distressed company playbook. Within this article we discuss trends from last year and predictions for the next in the LME space.

Click here to read the full article.

Written by:
Editor
Published on:
April 7, 2026

Categories: Cooperation Agreements, Distressed Finance, Liability ManagementTags: ConvergeOne, Cooperation Agreements, Dropdowns, Mitel, Serta, syndicated, Uptiers

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Recent Posts

  • The Value And Legality Of Lender Cooperation Agreements April 14, 2026
  • Liability Management 2026: For Better or Worse April 7, 2026
  • Distressed Debt Legal Insights: Fossil Group’s UK Restructuring Plan March 31, 2026

View by Subject Matter

363 sales Anthony Casey Bankruptcy Bankruptcy administration Bankruptcy Courts Bankruptcy Reform Chapter 11 Chapter 15 Claims Trading Cleary Gottlieb Comparative Law Corporate Governance COVID-19 cramdown David Skeel Derivatives DIP Financing Empirical Financial Crisis fraudulent transfer Jared A. Ellias Jevic Johnson & Johnson Jones Day Mark G. Douglas Mark Roe Mass Torts plan confirmation Priority Purdue Pharma Purdue Pharma bankruptcy restructuring Safe Harbors Schulte Roth & Zabel Sovereign Debt SPOE Stephen Lubben Structured Dismissals Supreme Court syndicated Texas Two-Step Trust Indenture Act Valuation Weil Gotshal Workouts

Footer

Harvard Law School Bankruptcy Roundtable

1563 Massachusetts Ave,
Cambridge, MA 02138
Accessibility | Digital Accessibility | Harvard Law School

Copyright © 2023 The President and Fellows of Harvard College

Copyright © 2026 · Navigation Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in