• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Harvard Law School Bankruptcy Roundtable

Harvard Law School Bankruptcy Roundtable

  • Blog
  • About Us
  • Coverage-in-Depth
    • Crypto-Bankruptcy
    • Purdue Pharma Bankruptcy
    • Texas Two-Step and the Future of Mass Tort Bankruptcy
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Bankruptcy Court Frowns on SmileDirect’s Dismissal Request

By Timothy Q. Karcher, David M. Hillman, Vincent Indelicato, and Charles A. Dale (Proskauer Rose LLP)

Timothy Q. Karcher, David M. Hillman, Charles A. Dale, and Vincent Indelicato (clockwise from top left)

There is a growing trend of bankruptcy courts approving structured dismissals of chapter 11 cases following a successful sale of a debtor’s assets under section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code.

A structured dismissal is a cost effective way for a debtor to exit chapter 11 and is an alternative to (a) confirming a post sale liquidating plan, which is expensive and not always viable, or (b) converting the case to chapter 7, which introduces significant uncertainty and unpredictability with the appointment of a chapter 7 trustee to replace management.

In a structured dismissal, a 363 sale buyer can still retain the benefits of their “free and clear” sale order, and the estate retains whatever benefit may have resulted from the sale. Such benefits may include liquidating assets that might otherwise cause a continued drain on the estate’s limited resources. Similarly, a debtor’s post petition lenders may support entry of a dismissal order that ratifies the court’s prior orders, including any release provided to the post petition lender in connection with the court’s approval of DIP financing. The key takeaway is that the order approving a structured dismissal typically allows parties to retain certain of the benefits of chapter 11, including releases, even if confirmation of a chapter 11 plan cannot be obtained.

While the trend towards structured dismissal may continue to grow, this article highlights a recent decision out of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas in which a bankruptcy court denied a request by debtors to approve a sale of their assets to insiders, which was coupled with a request for a structured dismissal.

On January 24, 2024, Judge Christopher Lopez denied the debtors’ motions in SmileDirectClub, Inc. seeking approval of a sale of their remaining assets to their DIP lenders followed by a structured dismissal. The Court denied both motions and the cases were converted to chapter 7.

Click here to read the full article.

Written by:
Editor
Published on:
October 22, 2024

Categories: 363 Sale, Bankruptcy, Chapter 11Tags: Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy Courts, Chapter 11, Chapter 7, Charles Dale, conversion, David Hillman, Proskauer, restructuring, Structured Dismissals, syndicated, Timothy Karcher, Vincent Indelicato

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Chapter 15 Case Demonstrates Its Effectiveness as an Expedient Judicial Solution for Singaporean Insolvencies in the United States May 13, 2025
  • Do Rights Offerings Reduce Bargaining Complexity in Chapter 11? May 6, 2025
  • Rockville Centre Case Offers a Framework for Settling Mass Tort Bankruptcy Claims Post-Purdue April 29, 2025

View by Subject Matter

363 sales Anthony Casey Bankruptcy Bankruptcy administration Bankruptcy Courts Bankruptcy Reform Chapter 11 Chapter 15 Claims Trading Cleary Gottlieb Comparative Law Corporate Governance COVID-19 cramdown David Skeel Derivatives DIP Financing Empirical FIBA Financial Crisis fraudulent transfer Jared A. Ellias Jevic Johnson & Johnson Jones Day Mark G. Douglas Mark Roe plan confirmation Priority Purdue Pharma Purdue Pharma bankruptcy restructuring Safe Harbors Schulte Roth & Zabel Sovereign Debt SPOE Stephen Lubben Structured Dismissals Supreme Court syndicated Texas Two-Step Trust Indenture Act Valuation Weil Gotshal Workouts

Footer

Harvard Law School Bankruptcy Roundtable

1563 Massachusetts Ave,
Cambridge, MA 02138
Accessibility | Digital Accessibility | Harvard Law School

Copyright © 2023 The President and Fellows of Harvard College

Copyright © 2025 · Navigation Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in